19 Major Inconsistencies that Do Not Support CV-19 Narrative

In addition to the fact that every single Emergency Declaration in Canada is illegitimate, we found, oddly enough, 19 major inconsistencies that do not support the COVID-19 narrative. It is essential that you understand these evidence-based factors as they fall on the heels of all the illegitimate emergency declarations. They are vital pieces of the puzzle which will help you easily understand that all of these evidence-based inconsistences simply don’t hold up the COVID-19 narrative. 

19 major inconsistencies that do NOT support COVID-19 Narrative - PDF Download available at end of page:

• #1  COVID-19 virus has NOT been isolated! - VIDEO
• #2  COVID-19 deaths Combined into one Grand Total – Slight of Hand
• #3  Unethical Classification of COVID-19 Deaths
• #4  Is Anyone Dying from the Flu Anymore? 
• #5  Introducing “All-Cause Mortality" – VIDEO
• #6  ASYMPTOMATIC – Deemed Not Contagious by WHO – VIDEO
• #7  Irrelevancy of Testing Positive for COVID-19 
• #8  Shifting focus from Deaths to Cases 
• #9  COVID-19 "Vaccines" are NOT Mandatory, Experimental and Ineffective - 2 VIDEOS
• #10  Useless PCR Test and Portugal Court Ruling 
• #11  No-Test Order for Ontario Teachers - VIDEO
• #12  Emergency Plans Were Not Followed - VIDEO
• #13  Declarations of Emergencies based on Inaccurate Predictive Basis 
• #14  Ontario’s Command Table – Problem with Modelling Predictions 
• #15  Counting the Continual Declarations of Emergency in ONTARIO
• #16  When it is all going to end? 
• #17  Emergency Powers Shifted from EMCPA to Reopening Ontario Act – Slight of Hand
• #18  2nd Ontario provincial Declaration of Emergency in 2021 – Turning up the Heat
• #19  3rd Ontario provincial Declaration of Emergency in 2021 – Full Rolling Boil!

Summary of Questioning the Major Inconsistencies

Christine Massey, Canadian researcher and bio-statistician, has been filing Freedom of Information requests to public health institutions around the world, asking one simple question “has the virus been isolated?”  

To date she has confirmed evidence from 141 health/science institutions globally from 25 different countries, who all failed to cite even 1 record of “SARS-COV-2” purification, by anyone, anywhere, ever. Of that that list, 41 Canadian Institutions also confirm that there is NO evidence of viral isolation.  

This is alarming because the entire planet has been locked-down because of this non-existent virus.

Additionally, Dr. Derek Knauss, a clinical scientist and immunologist-virologist at a southern California laboratory, says he and colleagues from 7 universities are suing the CDC for massive fraud. The reason: not one of the 1,500 samples of people who tested “positive”, could find Covid-19. All people were simply found to have Influenza A, and to a lesser extent, Influenza B

Read April 18, 2021 articles about this: https://greatreject.org/laboratories-cant-find-covid-19-in-positive-tests/ 

The latest from Dr. Mark Baily, a microbiologist, medical industry and health researcher who worked in medical practice, including clinical trials, for two decades:

• None of the genetic sequences used in producing the “SARS-CoV-2” genomes were shown to come from inside any viruses. It is unclear where the genetic fragments originated from.

If the virus has not been isolated, then what exactly are they finding in those PCR “tests” for which people are testing positive? More importantly, how can they create a vaccine if they have not isolated the virus? 

Fast forward to our update on December 15, 2021, the government is claiming there were *29,994 COVID-19 related deaths in Canada and considering our unchanged population of nearly 38,000,000, this would represent 0.07% of the population who have died [(29,994 / 38,000,000)*100]. Wait a second! There is a fundamental problem with the death toll. Do you see where?  

* All COVID-19 deaths are being lumped into one Grand Total  * 

Important distinction -  the provincial and federal government are continually counting COVID-19 related deaths by combining two flu seasons and combining two years; it is unethical to present the number of deaths this way for the following reasons: 

• the government’s tally on COVID-19 related deaths should have reset at zero on January 1, 2021 and we'll be watching to see if they reset on January 1, 2022
• by not resetting their counter is not only misleading, but this gives the false perception there are more deaths than are truly being accounted for by year 
• why is this important to know?
• because you need to compare apples to apples in order to make a determination of significance
• you simply cannot keep the death toll running; there needs to be a fundamental cut off date so that you can measure its affects; to not have one is misleading and unethical reporting
• Statistics Canada has confirmed that they record their statistics on an annual basis, from January 1 to December 31  
• As Statistics Canada is the sole source of approved statistical reporting in Canada, Stand Up Canada will provide same statistical reporting by year; to do so otherwise, would be misleading and unethical

For the year 2020:  January 1 -  December 31, 2020, there were

• 15,651 COVID-19 related deaths in Canada, equivalent to 0.04% of Canada’s population 

For the year 2021:  January 1 - December 15, 2021, there were

• 14,343 COVID-19 related deaths in Canada, equivalent to 0.04%of Canada’s population

In addition to the way the government is incorrectly tallying up the COVID-19 related death toll, were you aware of how COVID-19 deaths have been classified? According to Statistics Canada, Canadian Vital Statistics – Death database, The cause of death variable in the death database is classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) “International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems”. So, we looked up how the WHO classifies COVID-19 deaths since they are being referred to as the source of authority on classifying deaths in Canada.  

According to their “International Guidelines for Certification and Classification (Coding) of COVID-19 as Cause of Death”:

• 2. DEFINITION FOR DEATHS DUE TO COVID-19 - A death due to COVID-19 is defined for surveillance purposes as a death resulting from a clinically compatible illness, in a probable or confirmed COVID-19 case, unless there is a clear alternative cause of death that cannot be related to COVID disease (e.g. trauma). There should be no period of complete recovery from COVID-19 between illness and death. A death due to COVID-19 may not be attributed to another disease (e.g. cancer) and should be counted independently of pre-existing conditions that are suspected of triggering a severe course of COVID-19.
• 3. GUIDELINES FOR CERTIFYING COVID-19 AS A CAUSE OF DEATH - In view of COVID-19 it is important to record and report deaths due to COVID-19 in a uniform way. A- RECORDING COVID-19 ON THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE OF CAUSE OF DEATH COVID-19 should be recorded on the medical certificate of cause of death for ALL decedents where the disease caused, or is assumed to have caused, or contributed to death.

In essence, anyone who died from a primary cause of death, like heart attacks, Alzheimer's, suicide, cancer – their death record was changed to COVID-19 IF they had tested positive or showed symptoms, including assumed to have COVID-19. Does that seem ethical to you?   

Want more proof of how the deaths in Ontario are overinflated? According to the Ontario.ca website, their death toll is based on “Deaths are determined by using the outcome field in iPHIS, CORES, CCMtool or The COD. Any case marked “Fatal” is included in the deaths data. Deaths are included whether or not COVID-19 was determined to be a contributing or underlying cause of deaths indicated in the iPHIS field “Type of Death”. IS THIS ETHICAL??? 

The number of COVID-19 related deaths are overinflated, as evidenced from the WHO’s classification system the government is using. If you removed the unethical classifications, just how many people truly died “from” COVID-19? Would it be comparable to how many people died “from” the flu each year? Does this make you wonder about the flu? If so, please read further below…  

The latest data on Statistics Canada is only for 2019 which reported that 6,893 people died from influenza and pneumonia (respiratory disease/the flu). The 2018 statistics were higher, reporting that 8,511 people died from same cause of death. 

Why is the death count for the flu going down when it went up on average each year by around 1,200? Could it be due to the unethical classifications of death?  Our answer is simply, YES.

The Government of Canada’s Influenza Weekly Reports clearly states that the flu starts to take a rapid decline around end of March 2020. On one of their last weekly reports, from September to October, they report “no influenza detections and no influenza activity was reported across Canada in weeks 39 to 40”. Is no one dying from the flu anymore? Just COVID-19?  Don’t you find it odd that the flu is suddenly disappearing? Something people have died from every year without fail since the beginning of time. Six in one, half-dozen in the other, as the saying goes…  

Do you know what this is? When you understand the vital significance of “all-cause mortality”, you will realize that this is the ONLY number to be concerned about. This means the total number of deaths, for all causes in a given period. All deaths, from all causes are added up into one total number for a given period of time. This number is then measured against the previous years all-cause mortality total and from the same time frame. You need to compare these two numbers to determine if there are more deaths now than last year.  

When Canadian scientist and researcher for the Ontario Civil Liberties Association, Denis Rancourt,  did this analysis in 2020, he found that this number had not changed as compared from this year to last!  Why is this significant?  Because if the all-cause mortality number has NOT gone up, it means that there are NO new diseases killing anyone. The data does not lie. This is the only way to scientifically know if there is a new disease killing people. We were astonished to understand this fact.

Incidentally, when you start classifying deaths by “cause of death”, it then becomes political. A death is a death, regardless of how someone died. When you start classifying deaths it then becomes very hard to know just how many people are dying from a new disease. 

So, let’s forget about the unethical classification of COVID-19 deaths for a moment. If LESS people are dying from heart disease or cancer now (because their deaths have been classified as COVID-19), and we have a NEW number of deaths attributed to COVID-19, BUT the overall number of all-cause mortality is the SAME – what does this tell you? It' is basic math.  

This is another case of six in one, half-dozen in the other, but to be perfectly honest, this is another slight of hand.

But WAIT! What about ALL of the people who are testing positive?

This is totally irrelevant. Why? Because we have a 99.9% recovery rate. The only people who will die with virus related complications, like the flu, are people with very compromised immune systems. Their immune system is already very weak and another hit to it is too much for the body to take. Thus, they die “with” the virus, not from it. The mass number of people testing positive is ONLY another fear tactic! The provincial and territorial governments are using testing as justification for the continuation of the states of emergencies and unconstitutional measures.   

Ok, so now we have been hearing for over a year now now that it’s about cases. 

I guess they have to focus on something to justify the lockdown as the death count is relative to a typical flu season. 

Cases, hmm? Guess the mask is not working.     

Cases, hmm? Guess the 1st vaccine, 2nd vaccine, 3rd booster shot is not working.

There are three major inconsistencies/issues surrounding these COVID-19 “Vaccines” in Canada and throughout the world.

1 – Forced vaccination in Canada is Unconstitutional:

Mandatory COVID-19 “vaccination” is being forced onto employees in Canada.  Vaccinate or terminate.  If you do not know already, vaccination in Canada is voluntary [chose language; scroll to page 3] because of our Canadian Constitution. Therefore, to make it mandatory for employment or participation in society now makes those measures unconstitutional.  To know your rights in this capacity, please visit our page called Your Rights to Refuse Mandatory Vaccination.

2 – These are NOT “Vaccines” until Experimental Trials End:

All of the COVID-19 injections are all still in experimental trials until 2023: 

• Moderna ends Nov 22, 2022
• Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen ends Jan 2, 2023
• AstraZeneca ends Feb 14, 2023
• Pfizer ends May 2, 2023

As these are all in Phase III experimental trials, they cannot be called “vaccines” in the traditional sense because of this very reason. They need to be referred to as what they are, which are experimental biological agents until the trials are over and safety and efficacy have been determined.

The reason all medical treatments have a 3rdPhase, is so that they can test on a select group of individuals for safety and efficacy. Once Phase III has been completed, and it has been determined that these biological agents are safe and efficient, only then can they be referred to as “vaccines” and administered to the general population – and on a voluntary basis.

To call these experimental biological agents “vaccines” is extremely misleading and unethical because it gives the impression that they are safe and effective.  This is not true at all. No one will know this until the trials are done in 2023. 

In addition, these injections contain a brand-new technology known as mRNA, which has never ever been used before or approved for human use. No one has any idea of the effect they will have on humans as it has NEVER been done before. That is why these experimental biological agents need to be tested in a select group, not the entire population of a country.

Mass Vaccination is Not a Select Group!

On May 28, 2021 a New Zealand High Court 23 ruling where the judge deemed it "reasonably arguable" that the limited-use provision granted for the vaccine rollout under section 23 of the Medicines Act was "problematic", as this was meant to encompass a limited number of patients, and arguably not the whole population. 

Essentially what this court ruling means is that medical experimental trials can only be carried out on a select number of people and that by logic, the entire population cannot be considered a select group. 

Therefore, the entire population of Canada cannot be considered a “select group” for these experimental trials. It is immoral and unethical to subject an entire country to an experimental biological agent. 

3. These “vaccines” are Ineffective 

How can we say this? Because in the true sense of what a vaccine is supposed to do, they are supposed to prevent the spread of a disease. These “vaccines” do not promise to stop the spread of COVID-19; they do not promise that you will still not catch COVID-19. 

Insisting the entire population of Canada become vaccinated, not once, but twice (during the experimental trials of these biological agents) within 14 days of each other, and to now include booster shots on top of these two injections (the sole purpose is to help with the efficiency of these vaccines because their effectiveness wanes) – tells you that these “vaccines” are ineffective.

The fact that people are still wearing a mask AFTER they have been fully vaccinated (once, twice, booster shots), tells you that these “vaccines” are not effective.

The fact that people who are fully vaccinated are still getting COVID-19, tells you that these “vaccines” are not effective.

Either these “vaccines” work, or they don’t. The evidence is in that they do not work.

Summary

We understand fully how fear is playing a major role in people’s lives. We all want to get back to normal and we will do just about anything to have that. People are either consumed with fear or consumed with being leery of the whole situation. Fear is what is leading people to make fundamental and irrational decisions to rush head on into an experimental medication. They just want to get their lives back. We all do. But using coercion or fear is not the way to do this because the ramifications of injecting yourself or your children’s tiny bodies with experimental biological agents cannot be undone.

First of all, the name is misleading. It is not a “test”. The late Kary Mullis, inventor of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in 1985, did so as a research tool. The PCR is not a test. It is an amplification technique which is great for research, that’s it. It is a research tool designed to find genetic material.  It should not be used for diagnosis of a disease as it is too sensitive.  It does not point to infections and therefore, anything deemed “positive” in terms of finding someone infected with COVID-19 is a mis-diagnosis and is useless.

Further, it was designed for 25 cycles. Remember this is an “amplification” technique. Think of it this way – this is identical to increasing the scale on a print job if you have something with small print and you would like to read it with a larger font. That’s what this PCR test does. We know now that hospitals are ramping up cycles to 37 - 45 (increasing the zoom) to find genetic material. You can find anything if you zoom in enough! The increase in cycles (or amplification) gives a 50-95% false positive error rate. All these “cases”, false-positive or not, are used as continual justification to keep us all locked down, to strip away our fundamental rights and freedoms under our Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 

November 11, 2020: Portugal (Europe)Lisbon Court of Appeal ruled that the PCR test “is unable to determine, beyond reasonable doubt, that a positive result corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus”.Most importantly, the judges decided that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection. The judges referred to the following publication: Surkova, E., Nikolayevskyy, V., & Drobniewski, F. (2020). False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 8(12), 1167–1168. doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30453-7Fulltext: www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30453-7/fulltext  

CDC No Longer Recommends Using PCR – After December 31, 2021:

In a vaguely written notice, the CDC is no longer recommending PCR testing after December 31, 2021 – without any indication as to why. They are now recommending other various diagnostic methods . 

However, if we go back to the #1 COVID-19 Inconsistency – that the virus has NOT been isolated, what are they finding that is making a diagnosis of this virus, when this virus has been proven to not exist?  That is the real question! There is so much deception that it is hard to keep track of the lies. Either there is science to back this up, or there isn’t?

In July 2020, Public Health Physician Dr. Yaffe Explains the No-Test Order for Ontario Teachers. She Admits to a 50% False-Positive Rate for COVID tests.

If Public Health is admitting that these tests yield such a high false-positive rate, why on earth would they be telling people to use them as they are totally unreliable?   

Do you think you can survive another second, third or fourth wave of forced business closures? 

Again, you need to ask yourself if any of these overwhelming abuses of authority, violations to our Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, coupled with the BILLIONS of Canadian tax-payer dollars spent on “COVID-19 measures” – is this really justified with only 15,651 COVID-19 related deaths in Canada for 2020 and 14,343 COVID-19 related deaths in 2021, out of a population of nearly 38,000,000? 

This is completely illogical.

With the latest revisions made under Stage 3 of the Reopening Ontario Act, in respect of mandatory vaccination and now mandatory proof of vaccination… which are extremely dire with serious implications, are you starting to see the whole “how do you boil a frog” analogy?

• Put a frog in a pot of cold water and slowly turn up the heat… [stay at home orders]
• The frog will not notice that the water is getting warmer as he is getting used to it… [masks]
• By the time he notices it is too hot, it is too late… [mandatory vaccination / mandatory vaccination passports = 24 hr digital surveillance]

The slow removal of our rights and freedoms since March 2020 has left many people like the unsuspecting frog. 

• We complied when the government said it would take two weeks to flatten the curve. 
• We complied when they were told that masks were mandatory. 
• We complied to incessant testing – even paying for it!!
• We complied to not leaving our homes, our provinces and our beautiful country. 
• We have even complied with mandatory vaccination and some people don’t have a problem “showing their papers” like Nazi Germany, to prove they have been vaccinated. 

But at what point will enough be enough? What's your line in the sand?

Q. Do you know how many people Hitler killed during his reign over Nazi Germany?

A. Zero. He never killed one single person. Everyone else did it for him. They were just following orders.