Canada-Wide Declarations of Emergency

Everyone in Canada needs to understand that all of the emergency declarations in each and every province and territory are ILLEGITIMATE . This isn't as complicated as you may think to understanding this. Our purpose is to expose this information so that you will do something about it.  To help with that, we've created a PDF DOWNLOAD of this page so that you can share it with your friends and family, your MPP's / MLA's and your Premier's.

Let's begin.

Have you ever wondered what it actually takes to make such a declaration, if only out of curiosity? 

We did.  And we were quite surprised by what we found. These are our findings from a purely analytical and evidence-based approach.

Did you know that in order to make a Declaration of Emergency in any province or territory in Canada, that certain “conditions” must be met first?  This would make sense, otherwise you could have mass pandemonium for nothing.  Conditions are like the “safety” feature on a firearm. 100% necessary or else you could kill someone by accident.  

However, this did not happen when each province and territory in Canada made their Declarations of Emergency back in 2020 (and continually ever since), predicated on the existence of a lethal virus.  

• go to end of page to read the #1 major inconsistency: Virus has never been isolated and to watch the VIDEO testimony by Christine Massey, Canadian researcher and bio-statistician
• go to end of page to read major inconsistency #2: COVID-19 Deaths Combined into one Grand Total

When we examined the criteria, it was clear that NONE of the Canadian provinces and territories met any of the “conditions” to make a Declaration of Emergency back in March 2020. 

Did you know that they based their initial declarations on a wildly inaccurate "predictive" model from the UK that was outrageously over predicting the number of deaths in Canada?  UK predictive model stated that 326,000 Canadians would die from COVID-19 virus in 2020.

In mid March 2020, each Canadian province and territory declared their respective Declarations of Emergency one right after another. Beginning on March 14 until March 27, 2020. Within 14 days, the entire country was locked down. Never before seen in our history.  

• March 14 – Québec
• March 16 – Prince Edward Island
• March 17 – Ontario & Alberta
• March 18 – Newfoundland, Saskatchewan, British Columbia & Nunavut
• March 19 – New Brunswick
• March 20 – Manitoba
• March 22 – Nova Scotia
• March 24 – North West Territories
• March 27 – Yukon

Here is what happened in Ontario

 Did you know that there have been three declared emergencies in Ontario? 

• 1st March 17, 2020
• 2nd January 12, 2021
• 3rd April 7, 2021

We need to take this back to the beginning - the original declaration of emergency back in 2020.

On March 17, 2020 when the province of Ontario made its declaration of emergency, there was only 1 COVID-19 related death in Ontario, and 2 in all of Canada. In fact, the first COVID-19 related death was reported in British Columbia on March 9, 2020, a man in his 80’s with reported underlying health conditions (CBC). Ontario’s first COVID-19 related death occurred on March 11, 2020, a 77 year old man (Global News). 

Why are we and the government referring to COVID-19 deaths as “related”? Because of the way the governments are classifying deaths. By their method and admission, there is no way to know for certain how many people have died “from” this virus. Detailed information can be found under the heading “Unethical Classification of COVID-19 Deaths” on our COVID-19 Inconsistencies page. As such, COVID-19 “related” deaths mean that there are X number of people who may have had COVID when they died. 

With Canada’s population of nearly 38,000,000 and only 2 COVID-19 related deaths at that time, all provincial and territorial emergency declarations were excessive, unreasonable and unjustified.

Because there are a lot of inconsistencies that don’t support the Covid-19 narrative (we found 19 of them!).  Because more and more people are questioning if the measures are causing more harm than good.  Because all Canadians and all business owners are now subject to the SECOND, THIRD and CONTINUOUS waves of unreasonable and unjustified lockdown measures. Many small business owners simply will not survive this first, second, third lockdown. 

Arm yourselves with this critical information so you can stand up and take your power back.

We will demonstrate to you, by using Ontario as a detailed example, how the Declaration of Emergency did not meet the “emergency” definition, including specific criteria required to make this declaration. Identifying that NO such emergency ever existed - then or now. 

We will include a macro-level analysis for all other provinces and territories in Canada so that you can see for yourself how the very same unjustified emergency declarations were also made fraudulently. 

• there are CALL-TO-ACTION links to end the illegitimate declaration of emergency under each province/territory listed further below

We will end this report with a list of 19 MAJOR INCONSISTENCIES of further evidence that does not support the Covid-19 narrative.  All of these inconsistencies follow on the heels of all of these illegitimate emergency declarations.  However, on this page we will focus on the first 2 major inconsistences noted at the end - the virus and the number of deaths,  because the emergencies were declared predicated on these 2 factors. 

Declaration Requirements & Analysis

March 17, 2020 – Premier Ford made a “Declaration of Emergency” under section 7.0.1 of the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act (EMCPA).

Our analysis:

In order to make this “declaration” though, the following 2 criteria needed to have been met under sub-section 7.0.1 (3). 

Criteria for declaration

7.0.1 (3) An order declaring that an emergency exists throughout Ontario or any part of it may be made under this section if, in the opinion of the Lieutenant Governor in Council or the Premier, as the case may be, the following criteria are satisfied:

7.0.1 (3) 1. There is an emergency that requires immediate action to prevent, reduce or mitigate a danger of major proportions that could result in serious harm to persons or substantial damage to property. 

Our Analysis

 THEN

• on March 17, 2020, there was only 1 COVID-19 related death in Ontario when the Premier declared the first provincial emergency
• “immediate” constitutes the “present time”, not a future anticipated event; 1 death at that present date in time did not constitute “immediate” action that needed to have been taken 
• 1 death did not constitute any “danger of major proportions” in consideration of Ontario’s population of just over 14,745,000 
• therefore, the criteria under 7.0.1 (3) 1. That there is an emergency that requires “immediate” action to prevent, reduce or mitigate a “danger of major proportions”, was not met thereby making the Premier’s declaration unjustified 

NOW

• on December 15, 2021, the government is claiming there were 11,682 COVID-19 related deaths  but they are combining two years which is misleading; they must be split by year
• *Imperative note: see the over-inflated and unethical reporting of deaths for Ontario under the section “Unethical Reporting of Covid-19 Deaths”
• 2020:  January 1 - December 31, 2020, there were 4,576 COVID-19 related deaths
• 2021:  January 1 - December 15, 2021, there were 5,517 COVID-19 related deaths
• “immediate” constitutes the “present time”, not a future anticipated event; 5,289 deaths for 2021 or even 11,682 deaths for 2020 and 2021, at this present date in time, does not constitute any “immediate” action which needs to be taken, especially when majority of those 2020 deaths occurred in long-term-care homes, AND out of a population of nearly 15 MILLION people, including when the recovery rate is 99.9%  
• legal precedence has been established in Ecuador on January 2, 2021 in this respect: “The Court found that the president based the state of emergency on a possible future risk and not a current one, without sufficient, clear and specific information. Since states of exception operate in the face of current and certain circumstances, the actual occurrence of the events was not justified. The court ruled to declare Decree No. 1217 unconstitutional”
• the only “immediate” action the Ontario government should have taken was to protect our most vulnerable citizens, namely the elderly in long-term care homes, by implementing their annual emergency plans which should have had this plan of action already established (to protect the vulnerable in an emergency)
• 3,879 deaths for 2021 or even 11,682 deaths for 2020 and 2021 does not constitute a “danger of major proportions”, especially when majority of those 2020 deaths occurred in long-term-care homes, AND out of a population of nearly 15 MILLION people, including when the recovery rate is 99.9%  
• therefore, the criteria under 7.0.1 (3) 1.  That there is an emergency that requires “immediate” action to prevent, reduce or mitigate a “danger of major proportions”, was not met (again) thereby making the Premier’s declaration unjustified 

7.0.1 (3) 2. One of the following circumstances exists.

Our Analysis

Starts to get a little complicated now; only ONE of three circumstances involving their “resources” must exist under this second Criteria – let’s examine these to see if any actually exist. 

7.0.1 (3) 2.i. The resources normally available to a ministry of the Government of Ontario or an agency, board or commission or other branch of the government, including existing legislation, cannot be relied upon without the risk of serious delay.

Our Analysis

There are several possible meanings – here are two of ours:

1st – that the existing “emergency plans” were "not reliable"

• did you know that every Municipality in Ontario and the Government of Ontario itself must formulate an emergency plan under sections 3, 6, 8 or 8.1 of the EMCPA?
• and that they conduct training exercises each year in order to be fully prepared for any emergency?
• and that this emergency plan is reviewed and revised each year?
• therefore, circumstance 7.0.1 (3) 2 i. does not exist because they had emergency plans in place that they would have been deemed reliable (otherwise, what is the point in having an emergency plan if you don’t think its reliable), which would have meant that no declaration of emergency would have been needed

2nd – that the "current medical system" could “not be relied on” to handle any crisis

• but wait, if the hospitals had not cancelled all surgeries and remained open for business as usual, then this “circumstance” would have existed
• but this did not happen
• in an effort to meet the “danger of major proportions” with the "future anticipated" medical crisis, the hospitals cancelled all surgeries, and cleared beds waiting for a tsunami of COVID-19 patients that never came (due to inaccurate modelling – UK and Command Table; all projected “future anticipated” deaths )
• Ontario Hospitals Occupancy (Daily Average %) – Decline Since 2017

1. Dec 2017 – 94.5%
2. Dec 2018 – 94.8%
3. Dec 2019 – 95.0%
4. Dec 2020 – 84.4%
5. Jan 6 2021 – 87.6%

• Ontario ICU Occupancy (Daily Average%) – Decline Since 2017

1. Dec 1-16 2017 – 86.66%
2. Dec 1-16 2018 – 91.21%
3. Dec 1-16 2019 – 83.51%
4. Dec 1-16 2020 – 80.84%
5. Jan 1-13 2021 – 81.60%

• therefore, circumstance 7.0.1 (3) 2.i. does not exist because the medical system took evasive action to deal with possible overwhelm, and hospitals and ICU occupancies are below average as compared to previous years, thereby making the health care system reliable to handle any emergency 

7.0.1 (3) 2.ii. The “resources” referred to in subparagraph (i) may be “insufficiently effective” to address the emergency.

Our Analysis

• again, if the hospitals had remained open for business as usual, this “circumstance” would exist
• however, the hospitals cancelled all surgeries to ensure they would be “sufficiently effective” to address the emergency, of which never came
• hospital and ICU capacity are below average since 2017
• therefore, circumstance 7.0.1 (3) 2 ii. also does not exist because they took strategic actions to ensure the health care system would not be overwhelmed; their medical system for capacity has been below average since 2017, thereby making them sufficiently effective to handle this emergency 

7.0.1 (3) 2.iii It is not possible without the risk of serious delay, to ascertain whether the resources referred to in subparagraph (i) can be relied upon.

Our Analysis

• our emphatic first response is, REALLY?!
• considering that the "resources” under subparagraph (i) are the 444 Municipalities, the Government of Ontario itself and the 384 hospitals in Ontario – with all of their elected officials, public servants and hospital staff
• considering the yearly review and training exercises of all emergency plans by municipal and provincial staff
• considering the cancellation of all surgeries by Ontario hospitals in their effort to meet this medical crisis (which never came)
• considering the decline of Ontario Hospital and ICU capacities since at least 2017
• therefore, in light of all of the considerations that all parties went to in order to be “reliable” and ready for emergencies, therefore, this circumstance 7.0.1 (3) 2 iii. also does not exist 

Based on the above analysis, the criteria for declaration of emergency under section 7.0.1 (3) of the EMCPA was not met in March 2020 and not met again in January 2021 or again in April 2021. 

Therefore, the Premier’s declarations were and still are unjustified, thereby making them illegitimate.

THEREFORE, NO SUCH “EMERGENCY” EVER EXISTED FOR ONTARIO - THEN OR NOW

What is the significance of this?  

All of the measures - stay-at-home orders; business closures; church and school closures; mandatory masks; mandatory vaccination; booster shots and now mandatory vaccine passport - all stem from these ILLEGITIMATE emergency orders. 

All of these measures will END once these ILLEGITIMATE declarations of emergency are terminated - and ONLY THEN can we get our lives back!!

Make no mistake about it.  All of these measures WILL NOT END unless WE the people do something about it.  They will not end, no matter how many vaccines or booster shots public health is forcing onto citizens.  It is time we opened our eyes to what is happening.  And then get busy doing something about it!

If you agree with our analysis and want to take action, please contact the Premier of Ontario and your MPP to demand that the emergency be declared terminated immediately.  Send the PDF copy of this document to support your demand.  Enough is enough!

• contact the Premier of Ontario
• contact your MPP – find by name or Riding

We did not protect our most vulnerable, instead, we are overwhelming the PUBLIC, not the public health care system with these measures. All of these measures are causing far more harm than good. We cannot sit idly by and do nothing about this! Please TAKE ACTION!

March 18, 2020 – the Government of Saskatchewan declared a state of emergency pursuant to section 17 of The Emergency Planning Act (available only as a downloadable PDF).

DEFINITION: “emergency” means:(i) a “calamity” caused by:(A) accident;(B) act of war or insurrection;(C) terrorist activity as defined in the Criminal Code;(D) forces of nature; or(ii) a “present “or “imminent” situation or condition, including a threat of terrorist activity as defined in the Criminal Code, that requires prompt action to prevent or limit:(A) the loss of life;(B) harm or damage to the safety, health or welfare of people; or(C) damage to property or the environment;

SUMMARY and CONCLUSION

THEN

• on March 18, 2020, there were 0 COVID-19 related deaths
• population: 1,181,897
• therefore, 0 deaths did NOT constitute a “calamity” or “present or imminent” situation, out of a population of 1,181,897

NOW

• on December 15, 2021, the government is claiming there are 941 COVID-19 related deaths, but they are combining two years which is misleading; they must be split by year 
• 2020:  January 1 - December 31, 2020, there were 155 COVID-19 related deaths
• 2021:  January 1 - December 15, 2021, there were 786 COVID-19 related deaths
• population: 1,181,987
• therefore, 155 deaths in 2020 and 786 deaths in 2021 do NOT constitute a “calamity” or “present or imminent” situation, out of a population of 1,181,897 and especially when the recovery rate is 99.9%! 

THEREFORE, NO SUCH “EMERGENCY” EVER EXISTED FOR SASKATCHEWAN - THEN OR NOW

CALL TO ACTION:

If you agree with our analysis and want to take action, contact the Premier of Saskatchewan and your MLA to demand that the emergency be declared terminated immediately.  Send the PDF copy of this document to support your demand.  Enough is enough!

• contact the Premier of Saskatchewan
• contact your MLA - find by non-filtered list of Members name, Party or Constituency
• contact your MLA if you don’t know your Constituency – find by your full street address 

March 27, 2020 – The Government of Yukon declared a state of emergency under the Civil Emergency Measures Act under Section 6 (1). Declaration and term of state of emergency 

6(1) The Commissioner in Executive Council may declare that a state of emergency exists in the Yukon or in any part there of “if” informed that “a war emergency exists” or if the Commissioner in Executive Council is of the opinion that a “peace time disaster“ exists. 

DEFINITION: “war emergency” means the state existing as a result of a proclamation issued by Her Majesty or under authority of the Governor in Council that war, invasion or insurrection, real or apprehended, exists “peacetime disaster” means a disaster, real or apprehended, resulting from fire, explosion, flood, earthquake, landslide, weather, epidemic, shipping accident, mine accident, transportation accident, electrical power failure, nuclear accident or any other disaster not attributable to enemy attack, sabotage or other hostile action whereby injury or loss is or may be caused to persons or property in the Yukon

SUMMARY and CONCLUSION

THEN

• on March 27, 2020, there were 0 COVID-19 related deaths
• population: 35,875
• therefore, 0 deaths did NOT constitute a “war emergency exists” or that a “peacetime” disaster exists, out of a population of 35,874

NOW

• on December 15, 2021, the government is claiming there are 14 COVID-19 related death, but they are combining two years which is misleading; they must be split by year 
• 2020:  January 1 - December 31, 2020, there was 1 COVID-19 related death
• 2021:  January 1 - December 15, 2021, there were 13 COVID-19 related deaths
• population: 35,874
• therefore, 1 death in 2020 and 13 deaths in 2021 does NOT constitute a “war emergency exists” or that a “peacetime” disaster exists, out of a population of 35,874

THEREFORE, NO SUCH “EMERGENCY” EVER EXISTED FOR YUKON - THEN OR NOW

CALL TO ACTION:

If you agree with our analysis and want to take action, contact the Premier of Yukon and your MLA to  demand that the emergency be declared terminated immediately. Send the PDF copy of this document to support your demand.  Enough is enough!

• contact the Premier of Yukon
• contact your MLA – find by party
• contact your MLA if you don’t know your electoral district – find by search of maps 

NONE of the Canadian provinces or territories were ever in a state of “emergency” back in March 2020 when they each declared one.  And they are still NOT in a state of emergency now.

This bears repeating from above:

What is the significance of this? 

All of the measures - stay-at-home orders; business closures; church and school closures; mandatory masks; mandatory vaccination; booster shots and now mandatory vaccine passport - all stem from these ILLEGITIMATE emergency orders. 

All of these measures will END once these ILLEGITIMATE declarations of emergency are terminated - and ONLY THEN we can get our lives back!!

Make no mistake about it.  All of these measures WILL NOT END unless WE the people do something about it.  They will not end, no matter how many vaccines or booster shots public health is forcing onto citizens.  Please don't fool yourself into believing that if we just did this, or if we just did that - whatever the government or public health is telling us to do, that we would get our lives back.  It isn't happening.   Why are we saying this? Because it has NOT happened yet.  The goal post keeps moving.  What happened to "two weeks to flatten the curve?"

It is time we opened our eyes to what is happening.  And then get busy doing something about it!

The original and continual extensions to the provincial and territories states of emergencies are unlawful, unreasonable and unjustified. The continual extensions are a gross ABUSE OF POWER, FORCE AND AUTHORITY! Are you not shocked and outraged with the evidence you see here?

The wording is very clear – “present” which means “existing or occurring now";  “imminent” which means “about to happen”. None of it occurred in the present moment and none of it occurred in the future. You cannot declare a state of emergency for an anticipated future event, especially for a virus with a 99.9% recovery rate. 

Final Evidence - Lawsuit – Ecuador’s State of Emergency – Unconstitutional

January 2, 2021: Ecuador (South America)

• Constitutional Court ruled that Decree 1217 for a State of Emergency declared by President Lenín Moreno on December 21, 2020 is unconstitutional. The Court found that the president based the state of emergency on a possible future risk and not a current one, without sufficient, clear and specific information. Since states of exception operate in the face of current and certain circumstances, the actual occurrence of the events was not justified. The President responded that his government will abide by the ruling of the Court because it is "respectful of the rule of law". He further stated that in large cities, the Intensive Care Units (ICU) are "on the brink" and that there may be an upturn in infections in January, for which they have a "contingency plan."

“Due to the foregoing, the Court decided: 

1. To declare Decree No. 1217 unconstitutional. 

2. Remind the President of the Republic and the competent authorities that the measures referred to in Decree No. 1217, aimed at avoiding crowds and mass meetings as well as preventing the possible risks of the new variant of COVID-19 identified in the United Kingdom, they can be adopted based on the attributions of the ordinary constitutional regime, even by the COE, as in fact has happened, without it being necessary to resort to the extraordinary powers authorized in a state of emergency. 

3. Faced with the possible risks of the new variant of COVID-19, the Court reiterated its call to the national government to reinforce, in a coordinated manner, the prevention mechanisms available under the ordinary regime.”

https://www.eluniverso.com/noticias/2021/01/02/nota/9245869/corte-constitucional-ecuador-dictamen-inconstitucional-decreto

Shouldn’t we be asking ourselves, what exactly happened to those elderly people in the Long-Term Care homes in Ontario and Québec? Does anything you’ve read here make you stop and question if these emergency orders are legitimate? Have you read anything that makes you want to stand up and say NO to what’s going on?

If you feel compelled to say something, but are afraid to speak up, you are now part of the problem. We know firsthand how difficult it is to speak up and stand out. It is uncomfortable and can be downright unpleasant. But…if you don’t take that individual action to speak up, nothing will change. We all need to stop waiting for the other person or group to save us in this situation. We are always that which we seek.

Don’t think you have it in you to speak up? Think again. You are stronger than you’ve been led to believe. The revolution you seek is never external. It is always internal. The revolution then becomes the revelation of your innate powers. 

Christine Massey, Canadian researcher and bio-statistician, has been filing Freedom of Information requests to public health institutions around the world, asking one simple question “has the virus been isolated?”
 

To date she has confirmed evidence from 141 health/science institutions globally from 25 different countries, who all failed to cite even 1 record of “SARS-COV-2” purification, by anyone, anywhere, ever. Of that that list, 41 Canadian Institutions also confirm that there is NO evidence of viral isolation.  

This is alarming because the entire planet has been locked-down because of this non-existent virus.

Additionally, Dr. Derek Knauss, a clinical scientist and immunologist-virologist at a southern California laboratory, says he and colleagues from 7 universities are suing the CDC for massive fraud. The reason: not one of the 1,500 samples of people who tested “positive”, could find Covid-19. All people were simply found to have Influenza A, and to a lesser extent, Influenza B. 

Read April 18, 2021 articles about this: https://greatreject.org/laboratories-cant-find-covid-19-in-positive-tests/ 

The latest from Dr. Mark Baily, a microbiologist, medical industry and health researcher who worked in medical practice, including clinical trials, for two decades: 

• None of the genetic sequences used in producing the “SARS-CoV-2” genomes were shown to come from inside any viruses. It is unclear where the genetic fragments originated from.

If the virus has not been isolated, then what exactly are they finding in those PCR “tests” for which people are testing positive? More importantly, how can they create a vaccine if they have not isolated the virus?

There are just so many inconsistencies with COVID-19 narrative, that we decided to list the remaining major inconsistencies on a separate page called "COVID-19 Inconsistencies”. Some times too much information on one page can dilute the absolute significance that these emergency orders were not valid. 

But remember, these emergency declarations were made on the predication that the virus is real and a danger to human life.

Fast forward to our update on December 15, 2021, the government is claiming there were *29,994 COVID-19 related deaths in Canada and considering our unchanged population of nearly 38,000,000, this would represent 0.07% of the population who have died [(29,994 / 38,000,000)*100]. Wait a second! There is a fundamental problem with the death toll.  Do you see where? 

* All COVID-19 deaths are being lumped into one Grand Total *

* Important distinction -  the provincial and federal government are continually counting COVID-19 related deaths by combining two flu seasons and combining two years; it is unethical to present the number of deaths this way for the following reasons: 

• the government’s tally on COVID-19 related deaths should have reset at zero on January 1, 2021 and we'll be watching to see if they reset on January 1, 2022

• by not resetting their counter is not only misleading, but this gives the false perception there are more deaths than are truly being accounted for by year 

• why is this important to know?

• because you need to compare apples to apples in order to make a determination of significance

• you simply cannot keep the death toll running; there needs to be a fundamental cut off date so that you can measure its affects; to not have one is misleading and unethical reporting

• Statistics Canada has confirmed that they record their statistics on an annual basis, from January 1 to December 31  

• As Statistics Canada is the sole source of approved statistical reporting in Canada, Stand Up Canada will provide same statistical reporting by year; to do so otherwise, would be misleading and unethical

For the year 2020:  January 1 -  December 31, 2020, there were

• 15,651 COVID-19 related deaths in Canada = equivalent to 0.04% of Canada’s population 

For the year 2021:  January 1 - December 15, 2021, there were

• 14,343 COVID-19 related deaths in Canada = equivalent to 0.04%of Canada’s population

There are just so many inconsistencies with COVID-19 narrative, that we decided to list the remaining 16 major inconsistencies on a separate page called "COVID-19 Inconsistencies”. Some times too much information on one page can dilute the absolute significance that these emergency orders were not valid. 

In summary, because we are reporting on the emergency declarations and basing it on deaths, it is absolutely essential to draw your attention to the #1 and #2 major inconsistences that do not justify these emergency orders. 

Remember:  these emergencies were declared based on the predication of these 2 factors being true.